Sunday, July 6, 2008

Community vs. Household Systems - Advantages & Disadvantages

One of the big issues that the water management portion of our project faces is the decision of whether to implement community or household systems.

Household systems are maintained by individual families. Each family is responsible for their system and their system only.

Advantages:
  • promotes independence
  • family understands the value of their system
  • those who benefit = those who are responsible (high incentives for maintenance)
Disadvantages:
  • household systems don't benefit from scale
  • poorest households may not be able to afford
  • elderly households without children may have trouble with maintenance
Community systems are maintained by the community. Responsibility may lie with a single individual or council or a rotating group.

Advantages:
  • benefits from scale (i.e. bigger systems sometimes offer lower price per person)
  • promotes a sense of community
  • only one system to maintain
Disadvantages:
  • enables free riders (people who benefit but do no work)
  • can create hierarchies (those who maintain the system have power over those who don't)
This a very rudimentary treatment of the problem as I have only just begun to explore the issue. I'm sure many of you out there have asked yourself this same question though so please share your experiences!

1 comment:

Daniel Bachhuber said...

If you're referring to filtration systems, I think the standard is for Point-Of-Use (POU) systems. With the filtration occurring at the household level, the clean water is less likely to be recontaminated. I feel like there have been many studies on the lack of efficacy at a community-based system, because the water become contaminated again as it is carried home and stored.